Reasons for Abolishing the last Penalty by Nanette Fleming There ar m either things that I dont have with in todays society, plainly tabu of both the wrongfulness doings that take place, I reckon the final stage penalisation is the worst of them all. I am strongly against the conclusion penalisation because it violates Gods rules, costs the tax payers in each case oftentimes m unitaryy, pris unrivalledrs could be falsely convicted, and it is cruel and unusual punishment. The first solid ground why I do not support having the finish penalty is that it violates religious beliefs. Many religions, such(prenominal) as my own, Catholicism, follow the rules that God displace to us through the Ten Commandments. One of the most historic of those therefore states, Thou shall not kill. If you are executing an individual, that distinctly violates this commandment. Murdering any person, no matter what the individual has been convicted of, is a dyingly sin. Therefore , anyone who support in executing people will be penalize by God. I believe that religious beliefs, such as the Ten Commandments, are the corner stone for our virtue system. implementation someone shouldnt be made an exception to the Gods rule. My a only whenting reason against the stopping point penalty is that the tax payers waste too much of their money with the death penalty in place. The norm death penalty case is appealed collar times. This means that the tax payers moldiness pay for the same trial to be hear three times. This is a real expensive practice. Also, the average convicted liquidator spends 12 years on death rowing. If supporters of the death penalty are positive enough to kill the person for committing the crime, shouldnt the supportes be reassured enough to execute them in a seasonably path? Why spend the tax payers money retentiveness these inmates in jail for... shame all the essays posted at one ti! me!- on the death penalty - i totally check off with you, but i have a couple of points to be the devils advocate and make you think. You say that it is expensive to go a captive on death row,However, it would be much to a greater extent expensive to pay for the up keep of death row prisoners for the rest of their lives (food,healthcare,wardens ect) You cite the intelligence as the basis for the truth system, but later mention a line from the bible -Tooth for a tooth , an eye for an eye and dissmiss it as wrong. Also, ufortunatly, you have to choose with the fact of public opinion. Dont for turn arse that you live in a country ruled by a man who, as governer of Texas, signed more death warrants than any other governer in history. rise up structured and well though out. upright work. At first, I was alienated when the paper went from death penalty to gangs to relationships. Then, realizing that the essays were combined, I reread se verally one for content. Death penalty - I disagree with your argument, but I herald you for taking on a very controversial issue. Youve interpreted into account a few of the contend points in your paper, but you missed a vital one; the viewpoint of the dupe and the victims family. The paper was well written and presented in an outstanding manner. Gangs - very informative on the history of Ameri fuel gangs. One hint, admit references to back up your facts, if possible. Well written. Relationships - A very in depth look at relationships (as if any guy can understand them. If so, please pass on the secrets). Well written. Good Paper! Actually, I did want to make one comment. The Catholic Church does not normally support the death penalty. The only time that they do support it is if the defense of others cannot be obtained in any other bloodless means of control. This, in a way, is a contradiction of itself, as we all whap that if yo u bar a man up in a prison cell 24 hours a day, the! re is a just misfortune that he will never kill again. Of course, then we would be charged with cruel and unusual punishment for tutelage him in solitary confinement for the rest of his lfe. To the Catholic church, this would look to be a better way, as the mans life is be spared. To me, as a Catholic, it doesn make any sense as memory him from harming others would mean locking him up as such and that he would go insane in the process. To wind this all up, in the view of the Catholic Church, it is better to prevent death by any bloodless means possible (including crusade the prisoner to insanity) than to end their lives. Wow! This is all so mistake! to a greater extent respect to ya! Good Job! If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.